Head-to-head

PICO 4 Ultra vs Pimax Crystal Light

PICO 4 Ultra scores 78/100 while Pimax Crystal Light scores 83/100. Compare specs, price, pros, cons, and platform tradeoffs.

vs

Spec Table

Full Comparison

Spec PICO 4 Ultra Pimax Crystal Light
Score 78 /100 83 /100
Resolution 2160x2160 per eye2880x2880 per eye
Refresh Rate Up to 90 Hz72 / 90 / 120 Hz
Field of View 104 deg class105 deg horizontal
Tracking Inside-out 6DoF with ring-free controllersInside-out tracking; optional Lighthouse faceplate
Battery Rear battery; balanced designWired PC VR headset
Weight 580 g815 g class
Platform PICO OSSteamVR PC

PICO 4 Ultra Verdict

PICO 4 Ultra is a strong Quest-style mixed-reality alternative in markets where it is officially sold. For U.S. buyers, availability and software library depth keep Quest 3 and Quest 3S ahead.

Balanced front/rear headset design
XR2 Gen 2 platform with 12 GB RAM
Color mixed-reality passthrough and depth sensing
Limited U.S. retail presence
Store library is smaller than Quest

As an Amazon Associate, TopVRNews earns from qualifying purchases. We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, without changing our editorial verdicts. Details

Buy on PICO $799

Pimax Crystal Light Verdict

Pimax Crystal Light is one of the strongest value picks for sim racers and flight sim players chasing high resolution. It is less elegant than compact headsets, but its pixel count and price are hard to ignore.

Very high resolution for sims
Local-dimming QLED panel option
Inside-out tracking without base stations
Large and heavier than compact PC VR headsets
Requires a powerful gaming PC

As an Amazon Associate, TopVRNews earns from qualifying purchases. We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, without changing our editorial verdicts. Details

Buy on Pimax $899